On 17/06/2005 Andrew Suffield wrote: > On Fri, Jun 17, 2005 at 04:25:43PM +0200, Jonas Meurer wrote: > > On 15/06/2005 Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: > > > Unfortunately people that are easily offended will always exist, even by > > > simple human body parts displayed in a very abstract manner (more abstract > > > than the pictures in any sexual education book). So we have to do > > > something about it, because it's a given. I was thinking that maybe > > > debtags would provide a solution. You can invent a tag "contains remote > > > references to natural reproduction" and anyone can use that to filter out > > > unwanted packages. > > > > the problem is, that most of these sexual pictures or whatsoever are > > created and even provided because they're offending. maybe not to offend > > somebody directly, but rather because offending material is that popular. > > That's simply another way to say that "the group of people who are > offended is a minority". even if the group where the material is popular is a minority itself? most minorities are a majority in particular communities. white men for example are a minority on earth, but a majority in the open source world. bye jonas
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature