On Fri, Jun 17, 2005 at 11:54:40AM +0200, Miros/law Baran wrote: > 17.06.2005 pisze Peter Samuelson (peter@p12n.org): > > > I think you'd best come up with a better line of argument. The "S" in > > DFSG does not stand for "copyright", it stands for "software". > > Software usually contains copyrighted code, and sometimes it also > > contains trademarked names or images. > > > You can argue that the DFSG does not apply to trademark restrictions, > > but I hope you have a better reason than "S stands for Copyright". > > You could also, as a courtesy to other readers, lay before us the > stunningly obvious proof that a free software that elects to use > trademarks automagically transmutates into non-free state. That would be the part where the trademark holder tells you that you can't distribute modified versions. -- .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield : :' : http://www.debian.org/ | `. `' | `- -><- |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature