Re: Help with the c2man to doxygen migration
* Junichi Uekawa <firstname.lastname@example.org> [2005-06-16 08:20]:
> > Srivastava pointed out that, "c2man has been dead upstream for years
> > (which was, so far, not a problem), and does not work with modern
> > C/C++ programs -- which _is_ a problem. The functionality has been
> > superseded with packages like doxygen". He wanted to remove c2man
> > back then (October 2003) but couldn't because some (but few) programs
> > still used it.
> Hmm.. there is a way to work around it, and I've been using the
A workaround for what? Against the problems with modern C/C++ code?
> Do you really need to remove it if it's a working code?
The tool is neither maintained nor supports modern programs, so I'm
not sure it's a great idea to keep it in the archive... Manoj wanted
to remove it in October 2003... so it's not as if the situation is
getting any better.