* Peter Samuelson (peter@p12n.org) wrote: > > [Jonas Meurer] > > i second the idea that debian should provide sources to the community > > which are entirely free. sources which contain the Mozilla trademarks > > and ignore their license are not entirely free. > > Nobody is ignoring the Mozilla trademark license. The issue is that > Debian is being offered non-transferrable rights to the trademark. And > whether not having DFSG-free rights to the *brand* makes the *product* > non-free. > > FWIW, I agree with the proposed extension to DFSG#4: [in terms of > distributing software,] Debian will not accept or exercise rights which > cannot be granted to Debian's users. Proposed extension? Is this actually been on the table before? -- Eric Dorland <eric.dorland@mail.mcgill.ca> ICQ: #61138586, Jabber: hooty@jabber.com 1024D/16D970C6 097C 4861 9934 27A0 8E1C 2B0A 61E9 8ECF 16D9 70C6 -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- Version: 3.12 GCS d- s++: a-- C+++ UL+++ P++ L++ E++ W++ N+ o K- w+ O? M++ V-- PS+ PE Y+ PGP++ t++ 5++ X+ R tv++ b+++ DI+ D+ G e h! r- y+ ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature