Re: baz and tla
"Benj. Mako Hill" <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> Without going down a semantic rathole, I'm happy to disagree here. In
> any case, it was meant more of a good-natured (if slightly vicious)
> jab against a program I love and am very critical of. I apologize if
> it came out wrong.
Er, no problem. I admit I pretty much ignore emoticons these days, as
many people seem to have the idea that "If I add a smiley, I can say
whatever I want!"
Occam's razor split hairs so well, I bought the whole argument!