<quote who="Miles Bader" date="2005-06-08 10:32:25 +0900"> > "Benj. Mako Hill" <mako@debian.org> writes: > >> IMHO, it's a bug if it doesn't work efficiently without specialized > >> assistance from shell completions. > > > > Absolutely. The fact that such a workaround is essential is a sign of > > serious problem. :) tla has those in force. :) > > Geez can you be a bit more trollish? It was meant to be good natured -- hence the emoticons. > Personally I value the actual functionality more than the CLI because I > can easily (trivially) work around the latter, but not the former. So do I. That's why I use tla and baz and advocate it others. I've moved all of my archives to tla or baz and have trouble using anything else. > In other words, it's not a "serious problem." Without going down a semantic rathole, I'm happy to disagree here. In any case, it was meant more of a good-natured (if slightly vicious) jab against a program I love and am very critical of. I apologize if it came out wrong. Regards, Mako -- Benjamin Mako Hill mako@debian.org http://mako.cc/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature