[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Status of 'sarge' for the amd64 architecture

On Sun, Apr 24, 2005 at 12:12:42AM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le samedi 23 avril 2005 à 13:20 -0700, Steve Langasek a écrit :
> > We are already running into size constraints (on an ongoing basis) with our
> > mirrors due to the size of the archive.

> Given that - if I believe the security team [1] - we are not able to
> provide security updates for arm, even in woody, is there any point in
> including it in sarge when we could include an architecture with working
> autobuilders just in place?

If we dropped arm, it would be to drop arm, not to trade it for something --
it's way too late to be talking about adding amd64 to the main archive for

Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: