On Sun, Apr 24, 2005 at 12:12:42AM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote: > Le samedi 23 avril 2005 à 13:20 -0700, Steve Langasek a écrit : > > We are already running into size constraints (on an ongoing basis) with our > > mirrors due to the size of the archive. > Given that - if I believe the security team [1] - we are not able to > provide security updates for arm, even in woody, is there any point in > including it in sarge when we could include an architecture with working > autobuilders just in place? If we dropped arm, it would be to drop arm, not to trade it for something -- it's way too late to be talking about adding amd64 to the main archive for sarge. -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature