Re: Status of 'sarge' for the amd64 architecture
In article <[🔎] 20050423221757.GF25852@mauritius.dodds.net>,
Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org> wrote:
>On Sun, Apr 24, 2005 at 12:12:42AM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
>> Le samedi 23 avril 2005 à 13:20 -0700, Steve Langasek a écrit :
>> > We are already running into size constraints (on an ongoing basis) with our
>> > mirrors due to the size of the archive.
>
>> Given that - if I believe the security team [1] - we are not able to
>> provide security updates for arm, even in woody, is there any point in
>> including it in sarge when we could include an architecture with working
>> autobuilders just in place?
>
>If we dropped arm, it would be to drop arm, not to trade it for something --
>it's way too late to be talking about adding amd64 to the main archive for
>sarge.
True, we don't want to miss the release date of September 2004.
Oh, wait ...
Mike.
--
One suspects that Chaucer would feel right at home on Usenet
-- The Jargon File, "flame".
Reply to: