Re: NEW handling: About rejects, and kernels
On Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 12:50:46AM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> What I meant is that if the firmware is truly burned into the chup,
> then I couldn't change it even if I had the source code. It was wrong
> to say that I don't *want* to modify it, but rather, that I *cannot*
> do so.
That's not true either. Manufacturers provide utilities to reprogram
their embedded FLASH components, particularly motherboard manufacturers
but also for disks, modems etc.
> I argue it because that's the point of *Debian*.
The social contract says something about our users too I think.
Must be in the fine print.
Hamish
--
Hamish Moffatt VK3SB <hamish@debian.org> <hamish@cloud.net.au>
Reply to:
- References:
- Re: NEW handling: About rejects, and kernels (Was: Re: NEW handling ...)
- From: Hamish Moffatt <hamish@debian.org>
- Re: NEW handling: About rejects, and kernels
- From: Henning Makholm <henning@makholm.net>
- Re: NEW handling: About rejects, and kernels
- From: Hamish Moffatt <hamish@debian.org>
- Re: NEW handling: About rejects, and kernels
- From: Thomas Bushnell BSG <tb@becket.net>
- Re: NEW handling: About rejects, and kernels
- From: Hamish Moffatt <hamish@debian.org>
- Re: NEW handling: About rejects, and kernels
- From: Thomas Bushnell BSG <tb@becket.net>
- Re: NEW handling: About rejects, and kernels
- From: Hamish Moffatt <hamish@debian.org>
- Re: NEW handling: About rejects, and kernels
- From: Thomas Bushnell BSG <tb@becket.net>
- Re: NEW handling: About rejects, and kernels
- From: Tollef Fog Heen <tfheen@err.no>
- Re: NEW handling: About rejects, and kernels
- From: Thomas Bushnell BSG <tb@becket.net>