Re: .d.o machines which are down (Re: Questions for the DPL candidates)
It's also not something that would totally destroy an architecture's
ability to release. Yes, it would be bad, but not the end of the world.
On Sun, Mar 20, 2005 at 02:36:12PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> Ben Collins <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> > I think they are designed too stringently. Guidelines should describe the
> > level of stability an arch is required to meet, and let the implementation
> > be whatever is needed, on a per arch basis, to meet those requirements.
> I think a reasonable requirement is "will not stop entirely due to the
> destruction of any single building by fire." Remember: this has
> happened to Debian before, it's not some kind of fantasy scenario.
Debian - http://www.debian.org/
Linux 1394 - http://www.linux1394.org/
Subversion - http://subversion.tigris.org/
WatchGuard - http://www.watchguard.com/