Re: .d.o machines which are down (Re: Questions for the DPL candidates)
Auric is down, because it is a only a U60. I attempted to move some drives
around, and I did put them in the wrong place.
The delay in getting it fixed is, as I said, getting a response from James
to move the new machine there. No reason to fix auric if I can just
Stop chasing red herrings, and just get back to work. Sparc has always
been and always will be a maintained architecture.
On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 07:17:42PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> Ben Collins <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> > Ok, I can guarantee that it never dies. The hardrives are raid 5
> > configuration, and the power supplies are redundant, and if any of the
> > three cpu/mem boards goes bad, I can just remove it and let the other two
> > (4x cpu's and 4gigs ram) run. Then there's also two 10/100mbit ethernet
> > adapters.
> So why isn't auric running now? It's down on a "RAID failure" or
> something like that, right?
> If a cpu/mem board goes bad, is "just remove it" necessary for the
> machine to keep working? What worries me is not the high-reliability
> enterprise hardware doing it's job, but your "day or two" delay in
> getting things back. The point of the N+1 rule, as I understand it,
> is to give a different kind of redundancy, so that we don't have to
> wait a day or two.
Debian - http://www.debian.org/
Linux 1394 - http://www.linux1394.org/
Subversion - http://subversion.tigris.org/
WatchGuard - http://www.watchguard.com/