Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting
On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 10:51:24AM +0100, Julien BLACHE wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org> wrote:
>
> >> And keeping IA64 in the loop is just another joke from the release
> >> team. It'd be interesting to find out, but I bet more m68ks were sold
> >> than IA64 last year.
> >
> > Which of these two architectures are you more likely to be able to run a
> > current 2.6 kernel on, BTW?
>
> I fail to see why this matters at all. It's not in your list of
> requirements, remember ?
>
> > You do know that m68k is the only architecture still carrying around
> > 2.*2* kernels in sarge?
>
> Yes. But there are 2.4 kernels available too, don't forget to mention
> that fact. No 2.6, though, but that's not a problem right now. Might
> become a problem for etch, I agree.
There is 2.6 work on m68k, just not all subarches are ready for it though.
> m68k folks, is there anything in the works for 2.6 ?
Yep, runs since a couple of month last time i was informed for that, at least
on the amiga arch.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
Reply to: