Re: Eduard Bloch in <[🔎] 20050314151030.GA1882@debian> > > I like this idea. SCC was a working codename that I think was originally > > intended to be changed as soon as somebody thought of something better, > > but nobody ever quite got round to it ... > > Does it sound discriminating because you associcate that with real life? > Is "second class port" be a better name? (scp.d.o)? Or "non-releaseable > ports", nrp.d.o? "second class" is always discriminating, regardless of applied to what. "nrp" would be another useless TLA in the Debian dictionary. "ports" just means what scc was meant for: Debian has been ported these architectures, but it's not the mainline releases. (The BSD "ports" use the same name for non-mainline packages, so that fits.) Christoph -- cb@df7cb.de | http://www.df7cb.de/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature