Re: ports.debian.org (Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting)
On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 03:31:30PM +0100, Christoph Berg wrote:
> Re: Andres Salomon in <[🔎] pan.2005.03.14.13.54.08.658006@debian.org>
> > without being constricted by others' deadlines and such. Unfortunately,
> > the naming (second class citizen?), and the feeling that their
> > architectures are no longer "officially supported", means that people will
> > view this as a negative thing.
>
> I'd propose to use a less "discriminating" name for the scc archive.
> What about ports.debian.org (which coincidentally already exists and
> http-wise points to http://www.debian.org/ports/)?
I like this idea. SCC was a working codename that I think was originally
intended to be changed as soon as somebody thought of something better,
but nobody ever quite got round to it ...
--
Colin Watson [cjwatson@debian.org]
Reply to: