[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: ports.debian.org (Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting)

#include <hallo.h>
* Colin Watson [Mon, Mar 14 2005, 02:40:56PM]:
> On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 03:31:30PM +0100, Christoph Berg wrote:
> > Re: Andres Salomon in <[🔎] pan.2005.>
> > > without being constricted by others' deadlines and such.  Unfortunately,
> > > the naming (second class citizen?), and the feeling that their
> > > architectures are no longer "officially supported", means that people will
> > > view this as a negative thing.
> > 
> > I'd propose to use a less "discriminating" name for the scc archive.
> > What about ports.debian.org (which coincidentally already exists and
> > http-wise points to http://www.debian.org/ports/)?
> I like this idea. SCC was a working codename that I think was originally
> intended to be changed as soon as somebody thought of something better,
> but nobody ever quite got round to it ...

Does it sound discriminating because you associcate that with real life?
Is "second class port" be a better name? (scp.d.o)? Or "non-releaseable
ports", nrp.d.o?

Aufgabe der Erziehung wäre es, den metaphysischen Hunger der
Menschheit durch Mitteilung von Tatsachen mit weisem Maß zu stillen,
statt ihnen durch Märchen, was ja die Dogmen sind, zu betrügen.
		-- Arthur Schnitzler

Reply to: