[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting

Hi, Hamish Moffatt wrote:

> especially given the requirement that you need <= 2 buildds.

I consider that requirement to be not warranted, and indeed unjustified.

If I had to think of a rationale for it, the only one I could think of
would be "the architecture needs to be fast enough not to block security

However, I consider an update whose $ARCH binaries are released a week
later not to be a problem. 

Not when the alternate choice is to not have Debian support $ARCH at all.

Matthias Urlichs   |   {M:U} IT Design @ m-u-it.de   |  smurf@smurf.noris.de

Reply to: