Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting

[Aurélien Jarno <aurelien@aurel32.net>]

Sven Luther a écrit :
>   - Not having slower arches hold up testing. 
Slower arches don't hold up testing. Arches with buildd not well managed do.

If you look at the current needs-build graph [1], m68k the slowest arch 
we support is going pretty well. On the other hand s390 (which is not a 
slow architectures), have the largest packages waiting to build.

Another example, I have uploaded lineakd yesterday, it is already built 
on all arches, except arm and ia64 [2]. In that case, I consider ia64 as 
a slow arch.

Bye,
Aurelien

[1] 
http://people.debian.org/~igloo/needs-build-graph/index.php?arches=&days=10
[2] I have built it manually on s390 to get the plugins built in the 
first pass.

--
  .''`.  Aurelien Jarno             | GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
 : :' :  Debian GNU/Linux developer | Electrical Engineer
 `. `'   aurel32@debian.org         | aurelien@aurel32.net
   `-    people.debian.org/~aurel32 | www.aurel32.net