Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting
On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 02:38:01PM +0100, Aurélien Jarno wrote:
> Sven Luther a écrit :
> > - Not having slower arches hold up testing.
> Slower arches don't hold up testing. Arches with buildd not well managed do.
> If you look at the current needs-build graph , m68k the slowest arch
> we support is going pretty well. On the other hand s390 (which is not a
> slow architectures), have the largest packages waiting to build.
And regarding to Bastian Blank, s390 waits on w-b admins to include a new
buildd. So, actually the w-b admin is holding up release. *oinkoink* :)
> Another example, I have uploaded lineakd yesterday, it is already built
> on all arches, except arm and ia64 . In that case, I consider ia64 as
> a slow arch.
Just another prove that buildds are not holding up the release. There are
other problems that actually do hold up indeed...