Re: NoX idea
On 02-Mar-05, 07:55 (CST), Christoph Berg <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> It would be nice for occasional no-X booting, e.g. for debugging. But
> then there's still single user mode for that, so "wasting" a whole
> runlevel for it doesn't seem so useful. The "nox" boot parameter seems
> much less intrusive.
Sure, until someone want's 'nonfs', and someone else wants 'nocups', etc.
Why is that people won't use the working, standard, way to do this?
The irony is that Bill Gates claims to be making a stable operating
system and Linus Torvalds claims to be trying to take over the
world. -- seen on the net