[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Package xxx has broken dep on yyy: normal?

On Sat, Feb 26, 2005 at 04:28:36PM +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Feb 2005 17:16:57 -0800, Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org>
> wrote:
> >That said, any package that is uninstallable in testing for such a long
> >period of time almost certainly has an RC bug that should be filed.  In the
> >case of gpe-contacts, this is definitely so; the package currently in
> >unstable cannot be built using sources in the archive (it depends on a
> >library that currently awaits ftp-master NEW processing), so should not have
> >been uploaded to main.

> Chances are that it was uploaded together with the library it depends
> on, relying on ftpmasters doing their work, as in processing new
> packages in reasonable time.

And if the new library package is rejected instead of being accepted?

Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: