Re: splitting a source package into 2 source packages
On Saturday 26 February 2005 02:45 am, sean finney wrote:
> hi,
>
> i'm maintaining a source package that produces two binary packages.
> however, one of the packages is built from a seperately distributed (same
> author, same website, but different tarball and versioning scheme)
> tarball.
>
> so i'm thinking these two packages should be generated from their own
> respective tarballs (and i'm not sure why they weren't in the first
> place). however, one thing that's not clear to me is whether or not the
> new second source package will have to make it through the NEW queue.
> if it does, this is a problem given that NEW seems to be stalled and the
> previous version of the package will be totally broken when the other
> is updated.
>
> comments would be appreciated... thanks.
>
> sean
I seem to recall hearing that NEW processing is based solely on binary
packages, so that the new source package would not need to go through NEW
if it creates a binary package that is already in the archive.
I couldn't find anything about this through google, though, so it may be
best to upload to experimental first and see if your new packages go right
in or not.
Josh
Reply to: