On Wed, Feb 23, 2005 at 12:35:50PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: > Ingo Juergensmann <email@example.com> writes: > > > On Wed, Feb 23, 2005 at 12:13:42PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: > > > > > Do the buildd people read this list? How do we get this cleaned up? > > > > As far as I can tell you: the m68k buildd people will have noticed that > > problem much earlier than you. > > > > Furthermore, I don't know if that's a problem of the m68k folks, but of that > > XF86 build... there are messages out there that this build (at least on > > i386) is not stripped. No wonder it is way larger than the normal build. > > > > But yes, it's "in" these days to public shout about those slow archs... > > *SIGH* > > I'm not complaining about the slow archs, and the m68k buildd failure > will surely be noticed. It has not, however, been retried. Why? > > I'm asking for *information*. How do I find out what the plans are? > > What about the mips and sparc failures? The buildd logs look like > FTBFS, even though that's not right; do they read this list? How does > one find out? How does one say: "this is blocking my package, can you > give me an estimate on how long it will take?" > > I'm not trying to grind an axe or complain, I'm seeking information > and to move the process along expeditiously because it's blocking a > lot more than just an xfree86 upgrade. > Hi Thomas, it seems odd that the machines that build the packages for the countless hordes have no current way to reach them. If a compromise occured on one of these, how would anyone know? How could they be reached? If all buildd's are now DD, shouldn't they be reachable? cordially, Kev -- counter.li.org #238656 -- goto counter.li.org and be counted! (__) (oo) /------\/ / | || * /\---/\ ~~ ~~ ...."Have you mooed today?"...
Description: Digital signature