Re: amd64 is already the 2nd most important arch (WasRe: Let's remove mips, mipsel, s390, ... (Was: [Fwd: Re: GTK+2.0 2.6.2-3 and buildds running out of space])

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: amd64 is already the 2nd most important arch (WasRe: Let's remove mips, mipsel, s390, ... (Was: [Fwd: Re: GTK+2.0 2.6.2-3 and buildds running out of space])
From: Petri Latvala <adrinael@nuclearzone.org>
Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2005 10:11:12 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 20050223081112.GC10477@adrinael.net>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] loom.20050223T034927-365@post.gmane.org>
References: <[🔎] loom.20050220T234508-855@post.gmane.org> <[🔎] 20050221103335.GC2811@grep.be> <[🔎] 20050221191319.GB21350@bignachos.com> <[🔎] loom.20050222T035900-997@post.gmane.org> <[🔎] 20050222035511.GA8609@hezmatt.org> <[🔎] loom.20050222T051605-418@post.gmane.org> <[🔎] 20050222051544.GA9362@hezmatt.org> <[🔎] loom.20050222T062015-311@post.gmane.org> <[🔎] 20050222061803.GY1351@xieana.donarmstrong.org> <[🔎] loom.20050223T034927-365@post.gmane.org>

On Wed, Feb 23, 2005 at 03:08:11AM +0000, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
<stuff and numbers>



Just because an arch is fairly unused doesn't mean we should drop
it. We should drop an arch just like we would drop a package - if it
doesn't work, no one wants to maintain it, and if keeping it would
delay release.


-- 
Petri Latvala

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to:

References:
- Let's remove mips, mipsel, s390, ... (Was: [Fwd: Re: GTK+2.0 2.6.2-3 and buildds running out of space])
  - From: Dirk Eddelbuettel <edd@debian.org>
- Re: Let's remove mips, mipsel, s390, ... (Was: [Fwd: Re: GTK+2.0 2.6.2-3 and buildds running out of space])
  - From: Wouter Verhelst <wouter@debian.org>
- Re: Let's remove mips, mipsel, s390, ... (Was: [Fwd: Re: GTK+2.0 2.6.2-3 and buildds running out of space])
  - From: Brian Nelson <pyro@debian.org>
- Re: Let's remove mips, mipsel, s390, ... (Was: [Fwd: Re: GTK+2.0 2.6.2-3 and buildds running out of space])
  - From: Dirk Eddelbuettel <edd@debian.org>
- Re: Let's remove mips, mipsel, s390, ... (Was: [Fwd: Re: GTK+2.0 2.6.2-3 and buildds running out of space])
  - From: Matthew Palmer <mpalmer@debian.org>
- Re: Let's remove mips, mipsel, s390, ... (Was: [Fwd: Re: GTK+2.0 2.6.2-3 and buildds running out of space])
  - From: Dirk Eddelbuettel <edd@debian.org>
- Re: Let's remove mips, mipsel, s390, ... (Was: [Fwd: Re: GTK+2.0 2.6.2-3 and buildds running out of space])
  - From: Matthew Palmer <mpalmer@debian.org>
- Re: Let's remove mips, mipsel, s390, ... (Was: [Fwd: Re: GTK+2.0 2.6.2-3 and buildds running out of space])
  - From: Dirk Eddelbuettel <edd@debian.org>
- Re: Let's remove mips, mipsel, s390, ... (Was: [Fwd: Re: GTK+2.0 2.6.2-3 and buildds running out of space])
  - From: Don Armstrong <don@debian.org>
- amd64 is already the 2nd most important arch (WasRe: Let's remove mips, mipsel, s390, ... (Was: [Fwd: Re: GTK+2.0 2.6.2-3 and buildds running out of space])
  - From: Dirk Eddelbuettel <edd@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: amd64 is already the 2nd most important arch (WasRe: Let's remove mips, mipsel, s390, ... (Was: [Fwd: Re: GTK+2.0 2.6.2-3 and buildds running out of space])
Next by Date: Re: Let's remove mips, mipsel, s390, ... (Was: [Fwd: Re: GTK+2.0 2.6.2-3 and buildds running out of space])
Previous by thread: Re: amd64 is already the 2nd most important arch (WasRe: Let's remove mips, mipsel, s390, ... (Was: [Fwd: Re: GTK+2.0 2.6.2-3 and buildds running out of space])
Next by thread: Re: amd64 is already the 2nd most important arch
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread