Re: Let's remove mips, mipsel, s390, ... (Was: [Fwd: Re: GTK+2.0 2.6.2-3 and buildds running out of space])

To: Dirk Eddelbuettel <edd@debian.org>
Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Let's remove mips, mipsel, s390, ... (Was: [Fwd: Re: GTK+2.0 2.6.2-3 and buildds running out of space])
From: Thomas Bushnell BSG <tb@becket.net>
Date: 20 Feb 2005 16:22:21 -0800
Message-id: <[🔎] 87ekfazrr6.fsf@becket.becket.net>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] loom.20050220T234508-855@post.gmane.org>
References: <[🔎] 1108747259.15132.11.camel@localhost> <[🔎] loom.20050220T234508-855@post.gmane.org>

Dirk Eddelbuettel <edd@debian.org> writes:

> Our chances of actually releasing one day could only increase if we
> dropped arches such as mipsel, s390, m68k, ... and concentrated on
> those that actually mattered: i386, powerpc, amd64 -- and I'll
> gladly add a few more.  But a total of eleven is insane.

There isn't any evidence I've seen that these arch's actually slow
down the release.

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Let's remove mips, mipsel, s390, ... (Was: [Fwd: Re: GTK+2.0 2.6.2-3 and buildds running out of space])
  - From: Brian Nelson <pyro@debian.org>

References:
- [Fwd: Re: GTK+2.0 2.6.2-3 and buildds running out of space]
  - From: Clint Byrum <cbyrum@spamaps.org>
- Let's remove mips, mipsel, s390, ... (Was: [Fwd: Re: GTK+2.0 2.6.2-3 and buildds running out of space])
  - From: Dirk Eddelbuettel <edd@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: Let's remove mips, mipsel, s390, ... (Was: [Fwd: Re: GTK+2.0 2.6.2-3 and buildds running out of space])
Next by Date: Re: "The Debian exim 4 packages suck badly" on exim-users@exim.org
Previous by thread: Re: Let's remove mips, mipsel, s390, ...
Next by thread: Re: Let's remove mips, mipsel, s390, ... (Was: [Fwd: Re: GTK+2.0 2.6.2-3 and buildds running out of space])
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread