[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

"The Debian exim 4 packages suck badly" on exim-users@exim.org

Is it really necessary to take our internal issues to upstream's
mailing lists? Can't we have internal flamage internally?

Ian Jackson <ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk> wrote on
>To: Marc Haber <mh+exim-users@zugschlus.de>
>From: Ian Jackson <ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk>
>Sender: exim-users-bounces@exim.org
>Cc: exim-users@exim.org
>Marc Haber writes ("Re: Bug#276126: [exim] allow headers_remove|add options to be given 	multiple times"):
>> I am pretty well aware that Debian is unpopular with exim upstream
>> [...]
>Debian is rightly unpopular with Exim upstream because the Debian
>Exim4 packages have a vastly overcomplicated and buggy configuration
>generator which causes hassle upstream, and because the Debian Exim
>maintainers have badly managed the communications with upstream.

Other readers, please take a look at #295391 before participating in
the flamewar.


-------------------------------------- !! No courtesy copies, please !! -----
Marc Haber         |   " Questions are the         | Mailadresse im Header
Mannheim, Germany  |     Beginning of Wisdom "     | http://www.zugschlus.de/
Nordisch by Nature | Lt. Worf, TNG "Rightful Heir" | Fon: *49 621 72739834

Reply to: