Re: [Ipw2100-devel] debian, ipw2200 and wlan0
On Mon, 07 Feb 2005, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > I'll encourage Debian kernel maintainers to make the adequate changes.
> No, it's a totally arbitrary and pointless change.
During last two months I have seen at least three people
getting confused why wireless interfaces were denoted
to be wired by the naming.
Any cross platform software cannot rely on interface names
Um, and why is loopback interface named any differently?
If you are going to generalize interface name, please do
not tie it to one type of interface. Peoples scripts will