Re: MPEG in general Was: Is anyone packaging `lame' ?
I demand that Tollef Fog Heen may or may not have written...
> * Chris Cheney
>> Its all encumbered, there is a separate organization MPEG-LA that strictly
>> deals with the licensing. It is quite surprising to me that ffmpeg was
>> allowed into main.
> According to rumors I heard, it was allowed in since other applications
> (xine at least, I think) already included it. So it didn't really make a
> difference -- if we're infringing on patents with ffmpeg, we are with xine
> as well.
| Darren Salt | nr. Ashington, | linux (or ds) at
| woody, sarge, | Northumberland | youmustbejoking
| RISC OS | Toon Army | demon co uk
| We've got Shearer, you haven't
Your education begins where what is called your education is over.