MPEG in general Was: Is anyone packaging `lame' ?

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: MPEG in general Was: Is anyone packaging `lame' ?
From: "xerces8" <xerces8@butn.net>
Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 23:32:45 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] WorldClient-F200501072332.AA32450460@butn.net>

Hi!

( sorry for not properly replying, I'm using a webmail )

Is only MPEG Layer III patent encumbered ?
How about the other MPEG stuff ?
I find it hard to believe that it is all patent-free.

Regards,
David Balazic

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: MPEG in general Was: Is anyone packaging `lame' ?
  - From: Chris Cheney <ccheney@cheney.cx>
- Re: MPEG in general Was: Is anyone packaging `lame' ?
  - From: Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>

Prev by Date: Re: courier-maildrop vs maildrop
Next by Date: Re: New stable version after Sarge
Previous by thread: avoid being built against libflac-dev 1.1.1-1, and upload soon
Next by thread: Re: MPEG in general Was: Is anyone packaging `lame' ?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread