Re: Request for NMUs.
Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au> writes:
> On Sat, Jan 03, 2004 at 10:59:25AM +0000, Mark Howard wrote:
>> Indeed, we are discouraged from making NMUs for non-RC issues.
>
> Huh?
| During the release cycle (see Stable, testing, and unstable, Section
| 4.6.4.1), NMUs which fix serious or higher severity bugs are encouraged
| and accepted.
[Developers Reference 5.11.3]
This sounds as NMUs for non-RC issues are not accepted (and, in fact, i
couldn't find a sponsor for such a NMU)
Marc
--
$_=')(hBCdzVnS})3..0}_$;//::niam/s~=)]3[))_$(rellac(=_$({pam(esrever })e$.)4/3*
)e$(htgnel+23(rhc,"u"(kcapnu ,""nioj ;|_- |/+9-0z-aZ-A|rt~=e$;_$=e${pam tnirp{y
V2ajFGabus} yV2ajFGa&{gwmclBHIbus}gwmclBHI&{yVGa09mbbus}yVGa09mb&{hBCdzVnSbus';
s/\n//g;s/bus/\nbus/g;eval scalar reverse # <mailto:marc@marcbrockschmidt.de>
Reply to: