Re: Is anyone packaging `lame' ?
On Mon, Dec 27, 2004 at 05:17:35PM +0100, Florian Weimer <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> * Andrew Suffield:
> >> Quite a number of licensees disagree with your assessment of the
> >> situation, and I'm sure at least some of them have paid actual patent
> >> lawyers.
> > I'm sure those lawyers didn't talk to you. You're parrotting the
> > output of the marketing departments of the patent holders, which may
> > (but probably does not) match what the lawyers think.
> It's been documented publicly that the patent holders have been able
> to extort at least some money. But I'm sure you'll claim that all
> news stories about the patents, including the victims' statements,
> have been faked, so there's no point in arguing with you further.
SCO has been able to extort some substantial money for its supposed
copyright on Linux code. We should remove Linux.