[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Is anyone packaging `lame' ?



On Mon, Dec 27, 2004 at 01:30:57PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Andrew Suffield:
> 
> >> Yet mpg321 is in main.  This comes from the misunderstanding that no
> >> royalties are required for decoders (as opposed to encoders).  This is
> >> not true, though.
> >
> > Fraunhoffer only have patents on encoders, not decoders.
> 
> Fraunhofer is not the sole patent holder.  It even gets better: The
> list of patents on mp3licensing.com (Thomson's official site on MP3)
> is incomplete. 8-)

All of these appear to be patents on encoding, or postprocessing (some
of them also appear to be invalid). You probably can't have a patent
on decoding in the EU.

-- 
  .''`.  ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
 : :' :  http://www.debian.org/ |
 `. `'                          |
   `-             -><-          |

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: