Re: [volatile] status update

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: [volatile] status update
From: Thomas Hood <jdthood@yahoo.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2004 21:44:37 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] pan.2004.12.23.20.44.35.860538@yahoo.co.uk>
References: <[🔎] 20041223160528.GB24547@mails.so.argh.org> <[🔎] 20041223173431.GC15202@bignachos.com> <[🔎] 20041223200750.GI24547@mails.so.argh.org> <[🔎] 20041223202003.GE15202@bignachos.com>

On Thu, 23 Dec 2004 21:30:12 +0100, Brian Nelson wrote:
> "Transient"?  It's not perfect, but I think it's an improvement...

"dynamic"?
"aucourant"?

-- 
Thomas Hood

Reply to:

References:
- [volatile] status update
  - From: Andreas Barth <aba@not.so.argh.org>
- Re: [volatile] status update
  - From: Brian Nelson <pyro@debian.org>
- Re: [volatile] status update
  - From: Andreas Barth <aba@not.so.argh.org>
- Re: [volatile] status update
  - From: Brian Nelson <pyro@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: handling bugs of udev
Next by Date: Re: [volatile] status update
Previous by thread: Re: [volatile] status update
Next by thread: Re: [volatile] status update
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread