Re: Obfuscated source
* John Hasler (email@example.com) [041212 19:35]:
> Andi writes:
> > "preferred form for modification" is _only_ a GPL-term and not part of
> > the SC.
> The SC is not a legal document. Common sense should suffice to conclude
> that obfuscated source does not comply with the DFSG.
I didn't argue against that. I just said that the "preferred form of
modification" is _not_ the language of the SC, but the language of one
of the licenses that we consider as free.
PGP 1024/89FB5CE5 DC F1 85 6D A6 45 9C 0F 3B BE F1 D0 C5 D1 D9 0C