Re: Obfuscated source

[Andreas Barth <aba@not.so.argh.org>]

* John Hasler (jhasler@debian.org) [041212 19:35]:
> Andi writes:
> > "preferred form for modification" is _only_ a GPL-term and not part of
> > the SC.

> The SC is not a legal document.  Common sense should suffice to conclude
> that obfuscated source does not comply with the DFSG.

I didn't argue against that. I just said that the "preferred form of
modification" is _not_ the language of the SC, but the language of one
of the licenses that we consider as free.


Cheers,
Andi
-- 
   http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/
   PGP 1024/89FB5CE5  DC F1 85 6D A6 45 9C 0F  3B BE F1 D0 C5 D1 D9 0C