[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Obfuscated source



* Bruce Perens (bruce@perens.com) [041212 17:50]:
> Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> 
> >Imagine a source where all variables are named v<number> and all
> >functions f<number>. Is that still free? Where do we draw the line?
> >When does source stop to be bad style and start to become obfuscated
> >and unacceptable for main?
> > 
> >
> This has been handled before. Some people strip all comments and 
> unnecessary white space, and make all symbol names meaningless numbers. 
> In general it's done by a program, and they don't actually use that 
> version of the code for their own work. Thus, it's not the preferred 
> source code under the GPL.

"preferred form for modification" is _only_ a GPL-term and not part of
the SC.


Cheers,
Andi
-- 
   http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/
   PGP 1024/89FB5CE5  DC F1 85 6D A6 45 9C 0F  3B BE F1 D0 C5 D1 D9 0C



Reply to: