Re: Bug#283578: ITP: hot-babe -- erotic graphical system activitymonitor

[Thomas Bushnell BSG <tb@becket.net>]

Joey Hess <joeyh@debian.org> writes:

> Well, except for..

I'm sorry, I didn't mean that these other possibilities don't exist.
Bruce was not suggesting any of them either, and my real point is that
none of them are on-topic for debian-devel. 

> 6. project decides informally that potential legal liabilities outweigh
>    the benefit of putting some software in Debian, applies this on a
>    slightly ad-hoc basis (certian possibly-patent-infringing software, but
>    hardly all of it)

I don't know what in practice this amounts to, except the ftp-masters
or the DPL enforcing it, which reduces to the previous things.  

> 7. content of package referred to tech committee, who overrule the
>    maintainer[2]

tech-ctte has no jurisdiction over non-technical matters.