[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#283578: ITP: hot-babe -- erotic graphical system activitymonitor



Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> I'm sorry, I didn't mean that these other possibilities don't exist.

So why are you muttering about GRs when at least 9 other avenues exist
and GRs are proven to be divisive and a waste of time?

> Bruce was not suggesting any of them either, and my real point is that
> none of them are on-topic for debian-devel. 

Discussion of 3, 5, 7 are all strictly on topic for this mailing list.

> I don't know what in practice this amounts to, except the ftp-masters
> or the DPL enforcing it, which reduces to the previous things.  

Take a look at ITPs for things that infringe on the client-side rsync
patent.

> tech-ctte has no jurisdiction over non-technical matters.

It can be phrased as a technical matter.

-- 
see shy jo

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: