[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#283578: ITP: hot-babe -- erotic graphical system activity monitor

> I find the notion of introducing censorship in order to not 'hurt
> their feelings' to be morally repugnant.

Yes yes, I understand why you don't like it.  What I wanted was an
explanation of why objecting to this package was probably _more_
offensive than proposing it.

(Bearing in mind that in this context, "censorship" simply means not
shipping with debian, as opposed to attempting to deny access altogether.)

> It has been proven endless times that once you start doing this, you
> can't stop. For any package, there is going to be some minority group
> that is offended by it.

Sounds to me like your problem is not so much with the objection, but with
its expected implementation.


Reply to: