Re: Bug#283578: ITP: hot-babe -- erotic graphical system activity monitor
> I find the notion of introducing censorship in order to not 'hurt
> their feelings' to be morally repugnant.
Yes yes, I understand why you don't like it. What I wanted was an
explanation of why objecting to this package was probably _more_
offensive than proposing it.
(Bearing in mind that in this context, "censorship" simply means not
shipping with debian, as opposed to attempting to deny access altogether.)
> It has been proven endless times that once you start doing this, you
> can't stop. For any package, there is going to be some minority group
> that is offended by it.
Sounds to me like your problem is not so much with the objection, but with
its expected implementation.