Re: Bug#283578: ITP: hot-babe -- erotic graphical system activity monitor
> > > >>>As already written in -women, this is the point which saddens me the
> > > >>>most in this thread. I'm really disappointed by seeing most
> > > >>>contributors just not realize why this package, as proposed, is
> > > >>>likely to hurt the feelings of several women (probably not all, I
> > > >>>don't know) as well as, indirectly or not, some men.
>
> (And quite stunningly failing to realise that objecting to this
> package in this manner is equally offensive in the other direction,
> and probably more so.
Please humour me and spell it out for me in small words. I am
presumably missing something stunningly obvious.
b.
Reply to: