Re: Bug#283578: ITP: hot-babe -- erotic graphical system activitymonitor
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> writes:
> * John Goerzen (jgoerzen@complete.org) wrote:
>> On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 12:28:20PM -0200, Fernanda Giroleti Weiden wrote:
>> > "It is also the type of discussion that deterred me
>> > from becoming involved in Debian for some time."
>> >
>> > http://lists.debian.org/debian-women/2004/12/msg00011.html
>>
>> If our goal is to advance the cause of a Free operating system, then why
>> should we be including, in our OPERATING SYSTEM, images that serve no
>> useful purpose, and instead alienate millions or billions of people
>> worldwide? How does this advance our stated priorities: our users and
>> Free Software? Does anyone seriously think that we are being a
>> disservice to users because we don't have porn integrated into the
>> operating system? Does anyone seriously think that including these
>> particular images would be such an overwhelming benefit?
> I agree with this and is why I was suggesting that someone draft up some
> language which outlines, for the benefit of our users, things they're
> not likely to find in Debian. I suppose that might end up being too
> difficult but I think it'd be good to have some criteria for packages to
> pass in order to be accepted which includes issues like these and is
> clear enough that our users understand it.
I also agree with this, and think your proposal would be very useful.
I don't think the package in question furthers our production of a
free software operating system in any way.
- --
Roger Leigh
Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net/
Debian GNU/Linux http://www.debian.org/
GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848. Please sign and encrypt your mail.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.8 <http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/>
iD8DBQFBr0JWVcFcaSW/uEgRAi2lAKDZNlt6CfOWTFZXMnWpop9gfRnK5QCfQFlI
3KQbk8/OFAqErnx9IR4pz9Q=
=Cyqa
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: