Re: Bug#283578: ITP: hot-babe -- erotic graphical system activitymonitor
On Fri, Dec 03, 2004 at 01:04:50AM +0900, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 09:03:18AM -0600, John Goerzen <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> > Indeed, and this is also why Manoj's vi/KDE argument is not relevant.
> > vi serves a useful purpose for an operating system.
> > Porn/nudes/whatever don't.
> What about the bible, then ?
If it has to be removed for the sake of consistency, then remove it.
It's available from plenty of other sources.