Re: Bug#283578: ITP: hot-babe -- erotic graphical system activity monitor
On Thu, 02 Dec 2004 12:54:06 -0200, Fernanda Giroleti Weiden <fernanda@softwarelivre.org> said:
> Em Qui, 2004-12-02 às 05:45, Manoj Srivastava escreveu:
>> >> First of all, it's a sexist package, sure. Putting a program on
>> >> Debian in which you have pictures of nude women is VERY
>> >> agressive to the most women. Yes, it's agressive to me.
>>
>> > As already written in -women, this is the point which saddens me
>> > the most in this thread. I'm really disappointed by seeing most
>> > contributors just not realize why this package, as proposed, is
>> > likely to hurt the feelings of several women (probably not all, I
>> > don't know) as well as, indirectly or not, some men.
>>
>> Packages can hurt feelings, yes. vi hurts mine. The bible hurts
>> other peoples. purity-off also hurt a lot of peoples
>> feelings. Can't please everyone. There are over 15k packages in
>> debian. Some of them surely hurt the sensibilities of a lot of
>> people.
>>
>> Get over it. I have had to.
> Packages can hurts feelings? It's your big conclusion about it?
> Don't matters for you the obvious detail about gender equality? Are
If you think that a silly cartoon affects gender equality, I
suspect you are being over sensitive about things. Yes, this package
is in bad taste, and may offend people. I personally think this whole
issue has been overblown, but hey.
> you thinking to choose to be catholic is the same choice I did when
> I was born?
Choosing to be offended by what other people do is a choice.
> Sorry, but it's so stupid to me.
It is sooo nice to hear about your feelings.
manoj
--
Excuse me, but didn't I tell you there's NO HOPE for the survival of
OFFSET PRINTING?
Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
Reply to: