[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#283578: ITP: hot-babe -- erotic graphical system activitymonitor

On Wed, 1 Dec 2004 23:43:56 +0000, Will Newton <will@misconception.org.uk> said: 

> On Wednesday 01 Dec 2004 22:44, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> These nebulous authorities also frown upon various other things,
>> depending on your jurisdiction -- games of chance, the bible, games
>> promoting violence, texts promoting freedom ..
>> Descending to the lowest common denominator shall leave you with
>> the husk of an operating system.

> Well don't then. Take each case on it's merits. There's no need to
> wilfully lump it all together. If we are bothered about laws
> governing software licenses, why are we not bothered about laws
> governing other things? Are they beneath us?

	Who gets to decide for each case? Usually it is the person who
 does the work who makes the decision -- the packager, in this
 case. The only way to override that is call in the tech ctte -- but
 this is not a technical issue. Yup, a GR for each case.


"Regardless of the legal speed limit, your Buick must be operated at
speeds faster than 85 MPH (140kph)."-- 1987 Buick Grand National
owners manual.
Manoj Srivastava   <srivasta@debian.org>  <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B  924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C

Reply to: