[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#283578: ITP: hot-babe -- erotic graphical system activitymonitor

On Wed, 1 Dec 2004 23:47:47 +0000, Will Newton <will@misconception.org.uk> said: 

> On Wednesday 01 Dec 2004 22:15, Andrew Suffield wrote:
>> Anybody who can't obtain porn using only the tools provided on a
>> Debian CD is a total moron. You might as well complain that the
>> internet is bad, just because it's primarily used as a vehicle for
>> delivering porn.

> No. We are talking about "distributing" hot-babe. Debian never has
> and probably never will distribute "teh Intarnet". We cannot stop
> people doing anything with Debian that is within license terms once
> it is installed, but we can be held responsible for what we
> distribute.

	Yup. We also distribute purity-ogg. fortunes-off, and the bible.

>> [And that's without even starting on this insane notion that trying
>> to stop kids from seeing porn is somehow a good idea]

> Debian should have no moral concern, but a legal one is valid IMO.

	Right. There does not seem to be any indication that this
 material, like pictures of Raphael's nudes, is illegal to distribute.

> A concern about filling the archive with crap is a different thing
> altogether...

	Yup. need to get rid of vi.

A woman was in love with fourteen soldiers.  It was clearly platoonic.
Manoj Srivastava   <srivasta@debian.org>  <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B  924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C

Reply to: