[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#283578: ITP: hot-babe -- erotic graphical system activitymonitor

On Wed, Dec 01, 2004 at 08:50:08PM +0200, Kalle Kivimaa wrote:
> Yes, hotbabe is sexist (at least in it's current incarnation - if it
> included a male theme then it would only be sexually offensive to
> some)

Anyone who feels that hot-babe would become less sexually offensive because
it included naked male images as well as naked female images really does
need to rethink their ideas about offensiveness.  Somehow putting more
offensive images into a package doesn't strike me as being the way to make
something less offensive.

Personally, I don't have a problem with the package as-is -- the pictures
aren't exactly the most graphic thing that's likely to pop up unannounced in
a web-browser window, but the authorities frown on distributing anything
tittilating to minors in a lot of places, so I'd "vote" for making it a
series of pictures of a tree shedding it's leaves or something in the
default incarnation.

- Matt

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: