Re: Bug#283578: ITP: hot-babe -- erotic graphical system activity monitor
On Wed, Dec 01, 2004 at 07:34:06PM -0600, John Goerzen wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 01, 2004 at 05:53:08PM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> > On Wed, 1 Dec 2004 23:32:18 +0000, Will Newton <firstname.lastname@example.org> said:
> > And we have no time to set up i judgement over content --
> > there is a clear criteria for inclusion of packages in Debian already.
[ snip something about child porn ]
> I for one do not think that the cause of including porn in Debian is
> worth it. How many people here are willing to go to jail so that we can
> include porn in main?
Ok, Yes, if push comes to shove, I'll be happy to stand trial for the
inclusion of hot-babe in main.
Now, can we stop this stupid debate about something that is clearly a
non-technical issue and get on with doing what we do best?
Oh wait, this is d-d, isn't it...
A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion
Q. Why is top posting bad?
gpg key - http://www.halon.org.uk/pubkey.txt ; the.earth.li B345BDD3