Re: Bug#283578: ITP: hot-babe -- erotic graphical system activity monitor
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, Nov 29, 2004 at 09:38:52PM -0500, Stephen Frost wrote:
> * William Ballard (nospam_40811@alltel.net) wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 30, 2004 at 12:31:57AM +0100, Thibaut VARENE wrote:
> > > Of course, if you can be shocked by nudity, don't use it!
> >
> > I don't think things like this belong in the main distribution.
> > It's funny and all, but it sets a bad precedent and will scare
> > the straights.
>
> It's actually an interesting question- where does Debian draw the line?
> An interesting counter-point is the language used in Linux.
> Personally, I think the language in Linux is fine while I don't think
> it'd be good to have 'hot-babe' in Debian. Following along that, I
> don't think it'd be good to have explicit stories in a Debian package
> either.
>
> Perhaps if someone can come up with a good policy document that we DDs
> can agree to we can have something to point ours users to who want these
> packages as well as those who would do ITP's for such.
>
> Stephen
Hi Stephen,
what would happen if someone made a DFSG version of leisure suite larry!
- -Kev
- --
counter.li.org #238656 -- goto counter.li.org and be counted!
(__)
(oo)
/------\/
/ | ||
* /\---/\
~~ ~~
...."Have you mooed today?"...
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFBrF2rRp+kG4Nu//URAre9AJ9X1XI8XR9ouQaH9v4pEXLZO/E2AwCgn6dc
PeZvI+pbkm8Jtb7QJtEtErY=
=wHpk
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: