Re: Bug#283578: ITP: hot-babe -- erotic graphical system activity monitor
Kevin Mark <kmark+debian-devel@pipeline.com> writes:
> On Mon, Nov 29, 2004 at 09:38:52PM -0500, Stephen Frost wrote:
>> * William Ballard (nospam_40811@alltel.net) wrote:
>> > On Tue, Nov 30, 2004 at 12:31:57AM +0100, Thibaut VARENE wrote:
>> > > Of course, if you can be shocked by nudity, don't use it!
>> >
>> > I don't think things like this belong in the main distribution.
>> > It's funny and all, but it sets a bad precedent and will scare
>> > the straights.
>>
>> It's actually an interesting question- where does Debian draw the line?
>> An interesting counter-point is the language used in Linux.
>> Personally, I think the language in Linux is fine while I don't think
>> it'd be good to have 'hot-babe' in Debian. Following along that, I
>> don't think it'd be good to have explicit stories in a Debian package
>> either.
>>
>> Perhaps if someone can come up with a good policy document that we DDs
>> can agree to we can have something to point ours users to who want these
>> packages as well as those who would do ITP's for such.
>>
>> Stephen
>
> Hi Stephen,
> what would happen if someone made a DFSG version of leisure suite larry!
> -Kev
Put the 12+ version into main and the 18+ extended graphics into
non-free. But even then you still provide pronographic contents to
minors, just not on CDs.
Maybe hot-babe could get another set of graphics that are even less
offensive. A swimsuit edition without full nudity or something. The
images could then be split like fortunes normal and offensive cockies.
Just my 2c.
Goswin
Reply to: