Re: Intent to mass-file bugs: FDL/incorrect copyright files
Joost Witteveen wrote:
> And, BTW, how can GNU release for example gcc with info files that are
> GFDL, while it is clearly impossible to modify the gcc source code
> without the documentation?
This assertion is plain wrong.
> I mean, the GPL says about "source code":
> The source code for a work means the preferred form of the work for
> making modifications to it.
> Thus, the info files for gcc are part of gcc's source code, and should
> be released under the GPL.
> Oh, well, I'm must be missing something.
Ex falso quodlibet.