Re: Intent to mass-file bugs: FDL/incorrect copyright files
On Thu, Nov 18, 2004 at 11:21:57AM +0000, Brian Nelson wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 18, 2004 at 11:13:16AM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> > Brian, you're deliberately missing the point. The FTP masters used to
> > take the position that we should have a weaker standard for
> > documentation. We past a GR to prohibit this, and a second GR to make
> > the prohibition effective only after sarge is released, and I have no
> > reason to think that the FTP masters will ignore them.
> 1. It was an "editorial change" and was not supposed to change the
> overall meaning of the SC.
Regardless of what is was or wasn't, if the majority of developers
disagreed with it, why was the GR not reverted (cf. proposal D)?