[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Intent to mass-file bugs: FDL/incorrect copyright files

On Thu, Nov 18, 2004 at 11:21:57AM +0000, Brian Nelson wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 18, 2004 at 11:13:16AM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> > Brian, you're deliberately missing the point.  The FTP masters used to
> > take the position that we should have a weaker standard for
> > documentation.  We past a GR to prohibit this, and a second GR to make
> > the prohibition effective only after sarge is released, and I have no
> > reason to think that the FTP masters will ignore them.
> 1. It was an "editorial change" and was not supposed to change the
> overall meaning of the SC.

Regardless of what is was or wasn't, if the majority of developers
disagreed with it, why was the GR not reverted (cf. proposal D)?


Reply to: