Re: An important lesson
On Thu, 28 Oct 2004, Scott James Remnant wrote:
> On Thu, 2004-10-28 at 18:08 +0200, Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder
> wrote:
> > On Thursday 28 October 2004 16.40, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > > Warning: The signature is bad.
> >
> > I guess this was unavoidable in a posting about a security related issue
> > with GnuPG...
> >
> Verifies fine here.
If you ignore the:
gpg: WARNING: This key has been revoked by its owner!
gpg: This could mean that the signature is forgery.
gpg: reason for revocation: Key has been compromised
gpg: revocation comment: Compromised on the uid/gid remapping on alioth
perhaps.
Don Armstrong
--
Quite the contrary; they *love* collateral damage. If they can make
you miserable enough, maybe you'll stop using email entirely. Once
enough people do that, then there'll be no legitimate reason left for
anyone to run an SMTP server, and the spam problem will be solved.
Craig Dickson <crdic@pacbell.net>
http://www.donarmstrong.com http://rzlab.ucr.edu
Reply to: